Beverages

Beverages, Protein powder soy based

FDC 173181scoop (45 g)

Source: USDA FoodData Central · Public domain

Original analysis by NutriVerdict

Density 69 · +40 vs Beverages median

On our Nutrient Density Score, which measures beneficial nutrients per calorie relative to the foods we cover, Beverages, Protein powder soy based is a strongly nutrient-dense choice at 69 of 100. Within beverages it ranks 9 of 60. Per 100 grams it is an excellent source of protein (111% DV), an excellent source of iron (67% DV), an excellent source of dietary fiber (24% DV). Most of its 388 calories per 100 grams come from protein. Worth noting: it is high in sodium (733 mg per 100 g) and high in sugars (22.2 g per 100 g).

Source: USDA FoodData Central · Public domain

Fig. 1 · Macronutrient composition
Protein 55.6 g · 57%Carb 28.9 g · 30%Fat 5.6 g · 13%

Percent of calories derived by NutriVerdict from USDA grams

Nutrition facts

NutrientAmount% DV
Calories388 kcal19%
Total fat5.6 g7%
Saturated fat1.1 g6%
Cholesterol0 mg0%
Sodium733 mg32%
Carbohydrate29 g11%
Dietary fiber6.7 g24%
Sugars22 g
Protein56 g111%
Potassium933 mg20%
Calcium178 mg14%
Iron12 mg67%
Magnesium64 mg15%
Vitamin C0 mg0%
Vitamin A0 µg0%
Vitamin E0 mg0%

Source: USDA FoodData Central · Public domain

FDC 173181

Original analysis by NutriVerdict

What it is rich in

Nutrients supplying at least 10% of the Daily Value per 100 grams. 20% or more is an excellent source.

Protein111% DV
Iron67% DV
Dietary fiber24% DV
Potassium20% DV
Magnesium15% DV
Calcium14% DV

Original analysis by NutriVerdict

Versus the beverages median

Nutrient density69 vs 29 median
Protein / 100 g56 vs 0.2 median
Fiber / 100 g6.7 vs 0 median
Sodium / 100 g733 vs 12 median

Original analysis by NutriVerdict

More nutrient-dense swaps

Foods in the same category that score higher on nutrient density.

Cranberry juice cocktail, bottledDensity 73 vs 69Beverages, citrus fruit juice drink, frozen concentrateDensity 78 vs 69Beverages, pineapple and grapefruit juice drink, cannedDensity 81 vs 69

View the USDA source record