Compare foods

Meat extender vs Soy protein isolate, potassium type

Original comparison by NutriVerdict

Bottom line: Meat extender and Soy protein isolate, potassium type score the same on nutrient density, 89 of 100.

Meat extender and soy protein isolate, potassium type, tie at 89 of 100, but their nutrient profiles differ sharply. The isolate has more than double the protein, 88.3 g per 100 g versus 41.7 g, yet contains no fiber, while meat extender provides 17.5 g of fiber per 100 g. Meat extender also carries far less sodium, 10 mg versus 50 mg, and considerably more carbohydrate, 34.7 g versus 2.59 g.

Choose the soy protein isolate when protein density is the main goal, as 88.3 g per 100 g is exceptionally high. Choose meat extender when fiber and lower sodium matter, since the isolate offers none of the former. Despite the identical score, these two suit very different purposes in a recipe.

Head to head, per 100 g

MetricMeat extenderSoy protein isolate
Nutrient Density Score8989
Calories311 kcal321 kcal
Protein42 g88 g
Carbohydrate35 g2.6 g
Dietary fiber18 g0 g
Sugars-0 g
Total fat3 g0.5 g
Saturated fat0.4 g0.1 g
Sodium10 mg50 mg
Potassium1900 mg1590 mg
Calcium204 mg178 mg
Iron12 mg15 mg
Magnesium216 mg39 mg
Vitamin C0 mg0 mg
Vitamin A2 ug0 ug
Vitamin E-0 mg
Cholesterol0 mg0 mg

Source: USDA FoodData Central · Public domain

Frequently asked questions

Which has more protein, Meat extender or Soy protein isolate, potassium type?

Soy protein isolate, potassium type has more protein, 88.3 g per 100 g to 41.7 g.

Which has fewer calories?

Meat extender is lower in calories, 311 kcal per 100 g to 321 kcal.

Which has more fiber?

Meat extender has more dietary fiber, 17.5 g per 100 g to 0 g.

Full Meat extender profile Full Soy protein isolate profile