Chicken, feet, boiled
FDC 171119oz (85 g)
Source: USDA FoodData Central · Public domain
Original analysis by NutriVerdict
Density 47 · -30 vs Poultry medianOn our Nutrient Density Score, which measures beneficial nutrients per calorie relative to the foods we cover, Chicken, feet, boiled is middling for nutrient density at 47 of 100. Within poultry it ranks 54 of 60. Per 100 grams it is an excellent source of protein (39% DV). Most of its 215 calories per 100 grams come from fat.
Source: USDA FoodData Central · Public domain
Percent of calories derived by NutriVerdict from USDA grams
Nutrition facts
| Nutrient | Amount | % DV |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 215 kcal | 11% |
| Total fat | 15 g | 19% |
| Saturated fat | 3.9 g | 20% |
| Cholesterol | 84 mg | 28% |
| Sodium | 67 mg | 3% |
| Carbohydrate | 0.2 g | 0% |
| Dietary fiber | 0 g | 0% |
| Sugars | 0 g | |
| Protein | 19 g | 39% |
| Potassium | 31 mg | 1% |
| Calcium | 88 mg | 7% |
| Iron | 0.91 mg | 5% |
| Magnesium | 5 mg | 1% |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 0% |
| Vitamin A | 30 µg | 3% |
| Vitamin E | 0.27 mg | 2% |
| Nutrient | Amount | % DV |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 183 kcal | 9% |
| Total fat | 12 g | 16% |
| Saturated fat | 3.3 g | 17% |
| Cholesterol | 71 mg | 24% |
| Sodium | 57 mg | 2% |
| Carbohydrate | 0.17 g | 0% |
| Dietary fiber | 0 g | 0% |
| Sugars | 0 g | |
| Protein | 16 g | 33% |
| Potassium | 26 mg | 1% |
| Calcium | 75 mg | 6% |
| Iron | 0.77 mg | 4% |
| Magnesium | 4.3 mg | 1% |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 0% |
| Vitamin A | 26 µg | 3% |
| Vitamin E | 0.23 mg | 2% |
Source: USDA FoodData Central · Public domain
FDC 171119Original analysis by NutriVerdict
What it is rich in
Nutrients supplying at least 10% of the Daily Value per 100 grams. 20% or more is an excellent source.
Original analysis by NutriVerdict
Versus the poultry median
Original analysis by NutriVerdict
More nutrient-dense swaps
Foods in the same category that score higher on nutrient density.
Chicken, canned, no brothDensity 53 vs 47Chicken, ground, rawDensity 59 vs 47Pheasant, cooked, total edibleDensity 60 vs 47